Walker & Company

Retirement Tail Coverage for Attorneys: What to Know Before You Hang It Up

When an attorney retires or winds down a practice, there’s a big question that doesn’t get talked about enough:

What happens if a malpractice claim comes in after you stop practicing?

Because almost all malpractice policies are written on a claims-made basis, the policy only responds if the claim is made while your coverage is active. If you drop coverage when you retire, anything that pops up afterward could be uninsured. That’s why tail coverage (also called an Extended Reporting Period, or ERP) exists. It keeps the door open to report claims on past work, even after the policy ends.

Tail vs. Prior Acts — A Quick Difference

Many attorneys mix these up:

  • Prior acts coverage applies when you keep practicing and move to a new policy or carrier. It protects your past work.

  • Tail coverage applies when you stop practicing and need protection for future claims related to past services.

If you are leaving a firm but continuing to practice, you likely need prior acts. If you are truly retiring, tail is the key issue.

The Free Retirement Tail Benefit

Here’s the good news: many admitted carriers offer a free retirement tail if a few conditions are met:

  • You are permanently retiring from the practice of law

  • You have been insured with that carrier for at least three consecutive years

  • You are not retiring due to disciplinary or licensing issues

This is the ideal scenario. You’ve earned it, and it protects your entire career without a major expense.

There is one very important detail: carriers expect that you will stop practicing law entirely. Even occasional part-time or of-counsel work may disqualify the free tail.

When Retirement Tail Isn’t Free

If those requirements aren’t met — for example, recent carrier changes or continued part-time practice — the tail becomes an out-of-pocket cost. And it can be significant.

Most carriers charge 200% to 350% of your final annual premium, paid up front. A $5,000 policy could easily mean a $10,000–$17,500 tail bill.

For solos closing down a practice, that can be difficult if it wasn’t planned for.

How Scenarios Differ

Every retirement situation doesn’t look the same, and neither does the coverage:

  • Solo attorney fully retiring
    If you qualify for the free tail, great. If not, you’ll likely need to purchase it yourself.
  • Attorney retiring from a firm that will continue operating
    Sometimes the firm’s policy keeps your prior acts in place, so you may already be protected. But this needs to be confirmed.
  • Partnership dissolving or firm shutting down
    Someone needs to purchase firm-level runoff coverage to protect all past work. This is often one of the biggest expenses a closing firm will face.
  • Retiring but staying on in any capacity
    Even limited legal services usually mean you are not considered “retired,” which means the free tail likely isn’t available.

Plan for This Early

Tail coverage can be a smooth, no-cost benefit — or it can be a major expense. The difference often comes down to timing and good planning:

  • Understand your eligibility for the free retirement tail

  • Avoid last-minute carrier changes before retirement

  • Make sure prior acts are preserved if you are leaving a firm

  • Don’t assume someone else is covering your past work

If you are within a few years of retirement or a firm transition, a quick review of your coverage can save you a lot of money and stress later.

→ Request a quote
→ Book a quick call

Related Posts

Retirement tail coverage for attorneys is an important part of ending the practice of law without leaving gaps in malpractice protection. Lawyers who retire or close a law firm often need an extended reporting period endorsement (ERP) to handle claims made after the policy expires. Understanding when the free retirement tail benefit applies can help attorneys avoid costly paid tail premiums.

Many carriers offer free tail coverage after three or more consecutive years of continuous claims-made coverage, but attorneys must fully retire from legal practice to qualify. Solo attorneys, law firm partners, and lawyers leaving a firm for retirement all have different requirements when it comes to preserving prior acts coverage and preventing uncovered exposure.

Closing a law firm, dissolving a partnership, or transitioning out of a small or mid-size firm may require firm-level runoff coverage, which can be a major expense if not planned properly. Lawyers professional liability insurance remains essential even after retirement because malpractice claims often arise years after legal work is completed.

Attorneys should review prior acts dates, confirm continuous coverage, and work with a knowledgeable malpractice insurance broker to secure the correct retirement tail or ERP coverage. Clear planning can ensure attorneys protect their long-term career and retirement savings without unexpected malpractice insurance costs.